Sarah Palin exits a voting booth in 2008. Credit: Shealah Craighead.

Republicans may spend a lot of money to lose races in the Senate

The GOP could lose Senate races in Pennsylvania, Illinois, Wisconsin, New Hampshire, North Carolina and Missouri, which would end two brief years of Republican control of Congress. Senate aides say "the reason we don't hold the Senate, if we don't, is because of Donald Trump."

“What has to sting Republican strategists most is that they have the opposite problem in 2016 that they had in 2012.” Trump is polling five points behind down-ballot GOP candidates, whereas Romney polled five points ahead.

The GOP is closing the spending gap, but because their ad dollars are being spent so much later in the game, ad time is more expensive, and they’re getting less bang for their buck.

Oct 27, 2016

It is a testament to the politics of our times that Paul Ryan, the most conservative Speaker in the history of the country, won’t be conservative enough for a solid core of his own party in Congress, and is under siege from his party’s presidential nominee and acolytes.

If the Freedom Caucus makes good on its threat to oust Speaker Ryan, they'll put forward their own hyper-conservative candidate—to which Democrats will respond by allying with mainstream Republicans to nominate a centrist.
↩︎ The Atlantic
Oct 27, 2016

The only thing rigged about the election is gerrymandered control of the House. Republicans in state governments redrew 193 districts to their liking in 2010, whereas Democrats redrew just 44. That's led to bizarre results. "Pennsylvania favored the Democrats by nearly 100,000 votes, but the sophisticated new lines returned a delegation that somehow broke 13 to 5 for the GOP."

More Headlines