Smoke stacks from Saint Mary's Paper Mill. Credit: Billy Wilson.

The Climate Math Meets Methane

One of the biggest questions facing American energy policy is the role of natural gas. The Clean Power Plan swaps gas in for coal, but that has led to higher methane emissions than previously projected. Natural gas can be cheaply had through domestic fracking, and Donald Trump has played up his support for the fossil fuel in states like Pennsylvania. On the other hand, fracking is undeniably a consequence of Obama's controversial "all of the above" energy platform, and though he seems to have moved away from it, the Democratic Party remains split on whether the climate impacts of methane are too dire to keep fracking.

If you do the climate math, the answer is even simpler: we have to stop building new fossil fuel infrastructure right away

Sep 28, 2016

If the DC circuit court rules against the Obama administration, it is likely to do so on narrow and technical grounds.

The legal prospects for the Clean Power Plan are muddled but about to become a whole lot sharper.
↩︎ Climate Advisers
Sep 28, 2016

In some places, like California, it’ll make practically no difference at all. In others, like North Dakota, it’ll be earth-shifting.

How the Clean Power Plan will affect what energy sources are used by different regions around the US.
↩︎ Inside Energy
Sep 28, 2016

Environmental Regulations Are Still Shifting Energy Use

Despite the hold put on the Clean Power Plan, Obama has been able to reduce climate pollution through other domestic instruments. That includes expanding regulation to cover trucks and planes, using existing rules to require states to reduce unhealthy pollution that is cogenerated with carbon dioxide at coal plants, and withholding funding from states that don't comply.

The stay also didn't prevent the EPA from helping some states form carbon cap-and-trade style markets and defining a social cost of carbon that guides how government projects are evaluated.

Sep 28, 2016

The Ghost of Antonin Scalia

The legal challenge to the Clean Power Plan essentially contends that the executive branch doesn't have the power to intepret laws passed by Congress in new ways based on new information. It's a sort of specific application of legal originalism that Justice Scalia, may he rest in peace, invoked in joining four other justices in staying the Clean Power Plan last year

Environmentalists had hoped a swift resolution to Scalia's death would strengthen the Clean Power Plan against a court challenge, but his ghost continues to haunt Obama: yesterday a judge invoked a Scalia precedent that suggests Congress, not regulators, must be the source of decisions with "economy-wide" impacts. 

Sep 28, 2016
More Headlines