"Fake" televisions for sale in East Jerusalem. Credit: Ted Swedenburg.

Facebook needs to embrace its status as a major media company and find ways to improve the average quality of the news stories it recommends to its users.

Facebook is bad for politics and for readers. It provides journalists with perverse incentives and readers with an inferior product. It should rewrite clickbait headlines, hire better editors, and make the algorithm more transparent.
↩︎ Vox
Nov 8, 2016

Algorithms are always opinions embedded in mathematics.

Indirect has supplanted direct influence, argues Cathy O'Neil, author of Weapons of Math Destruction. She had a first-row seat to the real-time effect of algorithmic training on finance in 2008 and sees it now in social media.
↩︎ Harmony Institute
Oct 24, 2016

The best way to attract and grow an audience for political content on the world’s biggest social network is to eschew factual reporting and instead play to partisan biases using false or misleading information that simply tells people what they want to hear. 

BuzzFeed investigates hyperpartisan Facebook pages for truthfulness, to disconcertingly conclude that the least factual sites are also the most popular. Of posts shared by three right-wing pages, 38 percent were not true. For left-wing pages: 19 percent.
↩︎ BuzzFeed
Oct 24, 2016

If online identities allow us to migrate towards media that don’t challenge our views, perhaps the physical world offers a better shot at fostering civil discourse. We need "third places," neither work nor home, where people of different backgrounds share space—as in pubs, promenades, town squares, and coffeeshops.

As MIT Media Lab professor and famous computer scientist Alex Pentland argues, going outside is our only shot to save democracy.  

The old influence hierarchy has been shattered, replaced by a new mosaic of influence in which social media play a growing role.

Last January, MIT Media Lab unleashed social learning machines onto the web to understand who influences the election. It holds up pretty well today.
↩︎ MIT Media Lab
Oct 20, 2016

America’s partisan divide comes down to city v. country

Cracked can usually be counted on for liberal viewpoints and hearty laughs, but their executive editor soberly recasts America’s partisan divide as one between the city and the country. “The cities are less than 4 percent of the land mass, but 62 percent of the population and easily 99 percent of the popular culture. Our movies, shows, songs, and news all radiate out from those blue islands. And if you live in the red, that fucking sucks.”

A central part of his argument is that the media have failed, and not just in their characterization of Trump supporters. There’s a fundamental mismatch between the lifestyles depicted onscreen and what is possible for many Americans, a disjuncture that has borne heavily on rural minds while city folk have gone blithely on. That vacuum was, inevitably, filled.

Oct 20, 2016

Online social networks privilege information from "friends," and elevate that information to the position of trusted source. According to Edelman, a PR firm that has conducted an exhaustive review of how influence works in the social age, that crowds out previously conventional sources of wisdom like experts and academics. "Two of the top three most-frequently used sources of news and information are now peer-driven media, where content is shaped by the search preferences of other users, or directly curated by friends or family."

Studies have shown that this structural tendency inflames nascent confirmation biases we all carry into ballooning echo chambers where conspiracy theories can run rampant. That contributes to a decades-long trend towards political polarization in America, confirmed by Pew.

As Cass Sunstein puts it in review of a research paper: "Confirmation bias turns out to play a pivotal role in the creation of online echo chambers. This finding bears on a wide range of issues, including the current presidential campaign, the acceptance of conspiracy theories and competing positions in international disputes."

Edelman calls this divide between “mass populations” and “informed publics,” with the main difference being that the latter lot have got college diplomas. After the financial crisis of 2008, the two groups have diverged in terms of how much they trust institutions like the government and the media.

Twitter has colonized my mind. Almost every day for just under a decade, I have checked the site, have tweeted, retweeted, been subtweeted. My mental map is the frontier surrendered, and Twitter is the empire. To become occupied by a social network is to internalize its gaze. It is to forever carry a doubled view of both your own mind and the platform’s.

J.J. Gould, editor at TheAtlantic.com, once told me he had the internet in his head. Per this essay, he wasn't totally wrong. We've internalized social networks, injecting their biases and limitations into our personalities—and our civil discourse.
↩︎ Real Life
Oct 20, 2016
More Headlines